On Subgroupoid Lattices of Some Finite Groupoid
نویسنده
چکیده
We investigate finite commutative groupoids G = 〈G, ◦〉 such that g ◦ h 6= g for all elements g, h of G. First, we show that for any such groupoid, its weak (i.e. partial) subgroupoid lattice uniquely determines its subgroupoid lattice. Next, we characterize the lattice of all weak subgroupoids of such a groupoid. This is a distributive finite lattice satisfying some combinatorial conditions concerning its atoms and join–irreducible elements. In [5] we proved that for any (total) locally finite unary algebra of finite type (i.e. with finitely many unary operations), its weak subalgebra lattice uniquely determines its strong subalgebra lattice. Here we generalize this result for some finite commutative groupoids. Next, in the second part of this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions are found for a lattice to be isomorphic to the weak subgroupoid lattice of such a groupoid. The classical subgroupoids are sometimes called strong as opposed to the other kind of partial subgroupoids, called weak, considered in this paper. Recall that a partial groupoid H is a weak subgroupoid of a (partial) groupoid G iff the carrier of H is contained in the carrier of G, and for any elements g, h of H, if the product g ◦ h is defined in H, then this is also define in G and these two products are equal. The lattices of all weak and strong subgroupoids of a groupoid G are denoted by Sw(G) and Ss(G), respectively. (More details on various kinds of partial subalgebras and lattices of such subalgebras can be found e.g. in [3] or [4]; see also [6]). Theorem 1. Let G = 〈G, ◦〉 be a (total) finite and commutative groupoid such that (∗) g ◦ h 6= g for each g, h ∈ G. Let H = 〈H, ◦〉 be a partial commutative groupoid such that
منابع مشابه
Simultaneous Congruence Representations: a Special Case
We study the problem of representing a pair of algebraic lattices, L1 and L0, as Con(A1) and Con(A0), respectively, with A1 an algebra and A0 a subalgebra of A1, and we provide such a representation in a special case. Back in 1971, Ervin Fried posed the problem of representing a pair of algebraic lattices, L1 and L0, as Con(A1) and Con(A0), respectively, with A1 an algebra and A0 a subalgebra o...
متن کاملOn the Integrability of Lie Subalgebroids
Let G be a Lie groupoid with Lie algebroid g. It is known that, unlike in the case of Lie groups, not every subalgebroid of g can be integrated by a subgroupoid of G. In this paper we study conditions on the invariant foliation defined by a given subalgebroid under which such an integration is possible. We also consider the problem of integrability by closed subgroupoids, and we give conditions...
متن کاملNotes on the construction of the moduli space of curves
The purpose of these notes is to discuss the problem of moduli for curves of genus g ≥ 3 1 and outline the construction of the (coarse) moduli scheme of stable curves due to Gieseker. The notes are broken into 4 parts. In Section 1 we discuss the general problem of constructing a moduli “space” of curves. We will also state results about its properties, some of which will be discussed in the se...
متن کاملInduced Representations of Groupoid Crossed Products
We use Green-Riefel machinary to induce representations from a closed subgroupoid crossed product to the groupoid crossed product with a lower semicontinuous bundle of C∗-algebras .
متن کاملThe Interaction between Fuzzy Subsets and Groupoids
We discuss properties of a class of real-valued functions on a set X (2) constructed as finite (real) linear combinations of functions denoted as [(X, ∗); μ ], where (X, ∗) is a groupoid (binary system) and μ is a fuzzy subset of X and where [(X, ∗); μ ](x, y): = μ (x ∗ y) - min{μ (x), μ (y)}. Many properties, for example, μ being a fuzzy subgroupoid of X, ∗), can be restated as some properties...
متن کامل